The purpose of this chapter is to study the role of pre-existing trust as a key factor for successful buyer–supplier relationships in electronic versus face-to-face negotiation mechanisms. It is known that e-sourcing can damage the buyer–supplier relationship, whereas face-to-face discussions can help elicit collaboration intentions and build trust. However, it is less recognized whether having established a prior trusting relationship can positively affect outcomes and strengthen the relationship even when electronic mechanisms are used. We explore such an issue by conducting a laboratory study which compares three negotiation mechanisms (i.e., face-to-face negotiation, e-mail negotiation, and e-reverse auction) across two pre-existing levels of buyer–supplier trust (i.e., high-trust and low-trust) in terms of their impact on perceived relational outcomes. Results confirm that higher pre-existing trust is linked to higher relational outcomes than low pre-existing trust; face-to-face negotiation is associated with higher supplier’s perceived trust and satisfaction in dealing with the buyer compared to the e-mail negotiation and e-reverse auction. Furthermore, in the context of high pre-existing trust e-reverse auctions may not necessarily undermine existing relationships

Trust in Face-to-Face and Electronic Negotiation in Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Laboratory Study / Moramarco, Rossella; Cynthia Kay Stevens, ; Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo. - STAMPA. - (2013), pp. 49-81. [10.1007/978-1-4471-4878-4_3]

Trust in Face-to-Face and Electronic Negotiation in Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Laboratory Study

Moramarco, Rossella;Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo
2013-01-01

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to study the role of pre-existing trust as a key factor for successful buyer–supplier relationships in electronic versus face-to-face negotiation mechanisms. It is known that e-sourcing can damage the buyer–supplier relationship, whereas face-to-face discussions can help elicit collaboration intentions and build trust. However, it is less recognized whether having established a prior trusting relationship can positively affect outcomes and strengthen the relationship even when electronic mechanisms are used. We explore such an issue by conducting a laboratory study which compares three negotiation mechanisms (i.e., face-to-face negotiation, e-mail negotiation, and e-reverse auction) across two pre-existing levels of buyer–supplier trust (i.e., high-trust and low-trust) in terms of their impact on perceived relational outcomes. Results confirm that higher pre-existing trust is linked to higher relational outcomes than low pre-existing trust; face-to-face negotiation is associated with higher supplier’s perceived trust and satisfaction in dealing with the buyer compared to the e-mail negotiation and e-reverse auction. Furthermore, in the context of high pre-existing trust e-reverse auctions may not necessarily undermine existing relationships
2013
Behavioral Issues in Operations Management : New Trends in Design, Management, and Methodologies
978-1-4471-4877-7
Springer
Trust in Face-to-Face and Electronic Negotiation in Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Laboratory Study / Moramarco, Rossella; Cynthia Kay Stevens, ; Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo. - STAMPA. - (2013), pp. 49-81. [10.1007/978-1-4471-4878-4_3]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/13017
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact