This paper deals with the assessment of the uncertainty due to systematic errors, particularly in A/D conversion-based instruments. The problem of defining and assessing systematic errors is briefly discussed, and the conceptual scheme of gauge repeatability and reproducibility is adopted. A practical example regarding the evaluation of the uncertainty caused by the systematic offset error is presented. The experimental results, obtained under various ambient conditions, show that modelling the variability of systematic errors is more problematic than suggested by the ISO 5725 norm. Additionally, the paper demonstrates the substantial difference between the type B uncertainty evaluation, obtained via the maximum entropy principle applied to manufacturer’s specifications, and the type A (experimental) uncertainty evaluation, which reflects actually observable reality. Although it is reasonable to assume a uniform distribution of the offset error, experiments demonstrate that the distribution is not centred and that a correction must be applied. In such a context, this work motivates a more pragmatic and experimental approach to uncertainty, with respect to the directions of Supplement 1 of GUM.

Assessment of the uncertainty associated with systematic errors in digital instruments: an experimental study on offset errors / Attivissimo, Filippo; Cataldo, A.; Giaquinto, Nicola; Savino, Mario. - In: MEASUREMENT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0957-0233. - 23:3(2012). [10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035004]

Assessment of the uncertainty associated with systematic errors in digital instruments: an experimental study on offset errors

ATTIVISSIMO, Filippo;GIAQUINTO, Nicola;SAVINO, Mario
2012-01-01

Abstract

This paper deals with the assessment of the uncertainty due to systematic errors, particularly in A/D conversion-based instruments. The problem of defining and assessing systematic errors is briefly discussed, and the conceptual scheme of gauge repeatability and reproducibility is adopted. A practical example regarding the evaluation of the uncertainty caused by the systematic offset error is presented. The experimental results, obtained under various ambient conditions, show that modelling the variability of systematic errors is more problematic than suggested by the ISO 5725 norm. Additionally, the paper demonstrates the substantial difference between the type B uncertainty evaluation, obtained via the maximum entropy principle applied to manufacturer’s specifications, and the type A (experimental) uncertainty evaluation, which reflects actually observable reality. Although it is reasonable to assume a uniform distribution of the offset error, experiments demonstrate that the distribution is not centred and that a correction must be applied. In such a context, this work motivates a more pragmatic and experimental approach to uncertainty, with respect to the directions of Supplement 1 of GUM.
2012
Assessment of the uncertainty associated with systematic errors in digital instruments: an experimental study on offset errors / Attivissimo, Filippo; Cataldo, A.; Giaquinto, Nicola; Savino, Mario. - In: MEASUREMENT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 0957-0233. - 23:3(2012). [10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035004]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/2910
Citazioni
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact