Il binomio dialettico-critico Urbanistica/Architettura nell'infuturarsi della città contemporanea

The paper offers some remarks on the topic of the Conference in December and tries to look on a number of critical issues that cross transversally the expectations of both disciplines. The recall to some concepts that examine the complex issue that often sees the two different “practices” debate common themes, but separately -especially in defining analysis tools and project objectives that contribute qualifying, dialectically, the development of the contemporary urban systems–, it highlights the problems that appear in the work of both, whether in its own disciplinary autonomy, whether in the reciprocal relationship. It appears, then, of fundamental importance to acquire knowledge and equip yourselves with a common base, a substratum of means and aims adequate to the disciplinary codes of urban planning and architecture, so to avoid contradiction and achieve a balanced complementarity relationship. Starting, clearly, from the of reality and sharing the interpretative principles in order to build a scientifi c-cultural horizon participated in the defi - nition of the dynamics that explain the phenomenal reality today. Understanding of the reality that in an integrated form, albeit with the necessary disciplinary autonomy, aims to open a different “perspective of common sense” enabling to formulate, if nothing else, “questions” shared in an interdisciplinary perspective.