The built environment which surrounds us is, we believe, the physical way of being of its history, the way in which it accumulates itself, according to different thicknesses and meanings, to form the specificity of the site not only for what that environment percep-tually appears, but for what it is structurally. The place is built from the traces of its own history” (Gregotti V., 1986). The Milanese architect’s definition seems to allude – implicitly – to conceptual dyads concerning the architecture discipline: modification-continuity and project-morphology. Reflecting on each dyads’ term, the essays intends to “conceptualize” the theme of the project bringing it back to an eidetic procedure capable of determining a “modification” – conceived in the manner of a “conscious” act of being part of a pre-existing whole – of the things state: both through the recognition of structural rules and the identification of settlement principles coherent with the vocation of the “environment” – or the settlement – hosting the project itself. The theoretical speculation will find concrete relapse in two projectual experiences facing with current issues of urban project: the fragmentation of urban periphery and the re-signification of a disused area inside urban fabric.
Dyads of an operating thought: modification & continuity | project & morphology / Scardigno, Nicola. - ELETTRONICO. - (2020), pp. 76-83. (Intervento presentato al convegno 5th ISUFitaly International Conference tenutosi a Roma nel February 19-22, 2020).
Dyads of an operating thought: modification & continuity | project & morphology
Nicola Scardigno
2020-01-01
Abstract
The built environment which surrounds us is, we believe, the physical way of being of its history, the way in which it accumulates itself, according to different thicknesses and meanings, to form the specificity of the site not only for what that environment percep-tually appears, but for what it is structurally. The place is built from the traces of its own history” (Gregotti V., 1986). The Milanese architect’s definition seems to allude – implicitly – to conceptual dyads concerning the architecture discipline: modification-continuity and project-morphology. Reflecting on each dyads’ term, the essays intends to “conceptualize” the theme of the project bringing it back to an eidetic procedure capable of determining a “modification” – conceived in the manner of a “conscious” act of being part of a pre-existing whole – of the things state: both through the recognition of structural rules and the identification of settlement principles coherent with the vocation of the “environment” – or the settlement – hosting the project itself. The theoretical speculation will find concrete relapse in two projectual experiences facing with current issues of urban project: the fragmentation of urban periphery and the re-signification of a disused area inside urban fabric.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.