Since its very inception in the late decades of the twentieth century, environmental assessment (EA) has been imbued with a complex interplay of power, knowledge and values. Despite instrumental rationality seemingly dominating current practices, actors are faced with growing relational complexity and seem to be slowly becoming increasingly mindful of political, social and cultural implications of EA. Within this context, this paper explores the role of statutory environmental consultees in strategic environmental assessment (SEA), by reflecting on issues of power among the different actors involved, the handling of values and the generation, use and exchange of knowledge in SEA processes. The authors adopted a framework for contemporary environmental governance to map actors’ strategies onto a conceptual space stretching along two directions: the polarization between confrontational and collaborative attitudes, and the tendency to underpin knowledge claims with factual evidence or subjective considerations. By dwelling on a case study concerning the SEA of a national programme to promote sustainable urban development in metropolitan areas in Italy, the use of objectivity to support either neutrality- or advocacy-oriented approaches is contrasted with the use of strategies where statutory consultees have shown more adaptive and confrontational behaviours – that hinge upon both political and scientific legitimacy – to pursue their particular organizational strategies agendas.
Mapping power relations in SEA – the role of statutory environmental consultees. An Italian case-study / Gazzola, Paola; Bonifazi, Alessandro; Rinaldi, Alessandro. - In: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW. - ISSN 0195-9255. - STAMPA. - 83:July(2020). [10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106405]
Mapping power relations in SEA – the role of statutory environmental consultees. An Italian case-study
Alessandro Bonifazi;Alessandro Rinaldi
2020-01-01
Abstract
Since its very inception in the late decades of the twentieth century, environmental assessment (EA) has been imbued with a complex interplay of power, knowledge and values. Despite instrumental rationality seemingly dominating current practices, actors are faced with growing relational complexity and seem to be slowly becoming increasingly mindful of political, social and cultural implications of EA. Within this context, this paper explores the role of statutory environmental consultees in strategic environmental assessment (SEA), by reflecting on issues of power among the different actors involved, the handling of values and the generation, use and exchange of knowledge in SEA processes. The authors adopted a framework for contemporary environmental governance to map actors’ strategies onto a conceptual space stretching along two directions: the polarization between confrontational and collaborative attitudes, and the tendency to underpin knowledge claims with factual evidence or subjective considerations. By dwelling on a case study concerning the SEA of a national programme to promote sustainable urban development in metropolitan areas in Italy, the use of objectivity to support either neutrality- or advocacy-oriented approaches is contrasted with the use of strategies where statutory consultees have shown more adaptive and confrontational behaviours – that hinge upon both political and scientific legitimacy – to pursue their particular organizational strategies agendas.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.