Active flow control represents a key enabling technology for advancing aerodynamic performance, offering significant potential improvements in drag reduction, lift enhancement, and overall efficiency. This paper reviews state-of-the-art active flow control techniques originally developed for aerospace applications and evaluates their applicability to automotive systems, considering constraints such as packaging, efficiency, cost, and integration. A structured classification of fluidic, surface-based (including morphing), and plasma-based approaches is presented, followed by a comparative and decision-oriented assessment of their performance, technological maturity, and feasibility. The results indicate that synthetic jet actuators and morphing-based solutions provide the most balanced compromise between aerodynamic effectiveness and practical implementation. In contrast, conventional fluidic methods are limited by low system efficiency, while plasma-based techniques, although highly responsive, face challenges related to scalability and integration.
Active Flow Control Techniques: Classification, Analysis, and Future Trends for Automotive Applications / Herberg, M.R., De Pinto, S., De Tullio, M.D., Pascazio, G.. - In: FLUIDS. - ISSN 2311-5521. - 11:5(2026). [10.3390/fluids11050106]
Active Flow Control Techniques: Classification, Analysis, and Future Trends for Automotive Applications
Herberg, Marco Robert;De Pinto, Stefano;de Tullio, Marco Donato;Pascazio, Giuseppe
2026
Abstract
Active flow control represents a key enabling technology for advancing aerodynamic performance, offering significant potential improvements in drag reduction, lift enhancement, and overall efficiency. This paper reviews state-of-the-art active flow control techniques originally developed for aerospace applications and evaluates their applicability to automotive systems, considering constraints such as packaging, efficiency, cost, and integration. A structured classification of fluidic, surface-based (including morphing), and plasma-based approaches is presented, followed by a comparative and decision-oriented assessment of their performance, technological maturity, and feasibility. The results indicate that synthetic jet actuators and morphing-based solutions provide the most balanced compromise between aerodynamic effectiveness and practical implementation. In contrast, conventional fluidic methods are limited by low system efficiency, while plasma-based techniques, although highly responsive, face challenges related to scalability and integration.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

