The authors welcome the discussion concerning their paper ‘Coastal and inland karst morphologies driven by sea level stands: a GIS based method for their evaluation’ by F. Canora, D. Fidelibus, G. Spilotro, made by J. De Waele and M. Parise. It provides an opportunity to open a debate about the significance of geomorphological studies at different scales, both generally, and for the specific area of study (Murgia, Southern Italy).
Reply to the discussion on ‘Coastal and inland karst morphologies driven by sea level stands: a GIS based method for their evaluation’ by Filomena Canora, Dolores Fidelibus and Giuseppe Spilotro (2012) / Fidelibus, M. D.; Spilotro, G.; Canora, F.. - In: EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS. - ISSN 0197-9337. - STAMPA. - 38:8(2013), pp. 898-901. [10.1002/esp.3410]
Reply to the discussion on ‘Coastal and inland karst morphologies driven by sea level stands: a GIS based method for their evaluation’ by Filomena Canora, Dolores Fidelibus and Giuseppe Spilotro (2012)
Fidelibus M. D.;Spilotro G.
;Canora F.
2013-01-01
Abstract
The authors welcome the discussion concerning their paper ‘Coastal and inland karst morphologies driven by sea level stands: a GIS based method for their evaluation’ by F. Canora, D. Fidelibus, G. Spilotro, made by J. De Waele and M. Parise. It provides an opportunity to open a debate about the significance of geomorphological studies at different scales, both generally, and for the specific area of study (Murgia, Southern Italy).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
