Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a major policy evaluation tool, for institutional processes, when they need to cope with fundamental risks, give voice to non-human agents, manage commons, and address environmental justice. The interplay of SEA with planning, unravels key issues and criticalities in both urban governance and environmental democracy. How can evaluation be developed to support the process? Structured evaluation methods applied in environmental assessment are maybe not sufficient to solve complex social conflicts. We point out some key reflections with the aim of opening up the discussion, by taking the case study of the environmental assessment of pollutant activities in the main industrial port cities of Southern Italy. They represent, at the moment, the most significant social criticality in our country, related to the interplay between environmental assessment and risk for labor. The paper focuses on the case study by mentioning the evolution of some thoughts about the red stripe that links sustainability, environmental democracy, and social evaluation, and illustrates the issues of these aspects in the case study, with the aim of underlining the difficulty of environmental assessment tools as a major support for planning processes, when social conflicts arise.

Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases / Torre, C; Attardi, R; Bonifazi, A.. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 4(2012), pp. 3042-3065. [10.3390/su4113042]

Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases

Torre, C;Bonifazi, A.
2012-01-01

Abstract

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a major policy evaluation tool, for institutional processes, when they need to cope with fundamental risks, give voice to non-human agents, manage commons, and address environmental justice. The interplay of SEA with planning, unravels key issues and criticalities in both urban governance and environmental democracy. How can evaluation be developed to support the process? Structured evaluation methods applied in environmental assessment are maybe not sufficient to solve complex social conflicts. We point out some key reflections with the aim of opening up the discussion, by taking the case study of the environmental assessment of pollutant activities in the main industrial port cities of Southern Italy. They represent, at the moment, the most significant social criticality in our country, related to the interplay between environmental assessment and risk for labor. The paper focuses on the case study by mentioning the evolution of some thoughts about the red stripe that links sustainability, environmental democracy, and social evaluation, and illustrates the issues of these aspects in the case study, with the aim of underlining the difficulty of environmental assessment tools as a major support for planning processes, when social conflicts arise.
2012
Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases / Torre, C; Attardi, R; Bonifazi, A.. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 4(2012), pp. 3042-3065. [10.3390/su4113042]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sustainability-04-03042.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 983.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
983.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/3891
Citazioni
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact