The finishing and polishing of composite materials affect the restoration lifespan. The market shows a variety of finishing and polishing procedures and the choice among them is conditioned by different factors such as the resulting surface roughness. In the present study, 156 samples were realized with three composite materials, -microfilled, nanofilled and silorane-, and treated with different finishing and polishing procedures. Profilometric analyses were carried out on the samples' surface, the measured roughness values were submitted to statistical analysis. A complete factorial plan was drawn up and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to investigate whether the following factors affect the values of roughness: (i) material; (ii) polishing/finishing procedure. Tukey post-hoc test was also conducted to evaluate any statistically significant differences between the material/procedure combinations. The results show that the tested materials do not affect the resulting surface quality but roughness values depend on the finishing/polishing procedure adopted. The procedures that involve: (a) the finishing with medium Sof-Lex discs and (b) the finishing with two tungsten carbide multi-blade milling cutters Q series and UF series are those that allow the lowest values of roughness to be obtained.

Roughness analysis on composite materials (Microfilled, nanofilled and silorane) after different finishing and polishing procedures / Pettini, Francesco; Corsalini, Massimo; Savino, Maria Grazia; Stefanachi, Gianluca; Di Venere, Daniela; Pappalettere, Carmine; Monno, Giuseppe; Boccaccio, Antonio. - In: THE OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL. - ISSN 1874-2106. - 9:(2015), pp. 357-367. [10.2174/1874210601509010357]

Roughness analysis on composite materials (Microfilled, nanofilled and silorane) after different finishing and polishing procedures

PAPPALETTERE, Carmine;MONNO, Giuseppe;BOCCACCIO, Antonio
2015-01-01

Abstract

The finishing and polishing of composite materials affect the restoration lifespan. The market shows a variety of finishing and polishing procedures and the choice among them is conditioned by different factors such as the resulting surface roughness. In the present study, 156 samples were realized with three composite materials, -microfilled, nanofilled and silorane-, and treated with different finishing and polishing procedures. Profilometric analyses were carried out on the samples' surface, the measured roughness values were submitted to statistical analysis. A complete factorial plan was drawn up and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to investigate whether the following factors affect the values of roughness: (i) material; (ii) polishing/finishing procedure. Tukey post-hoc test was also conducted to evaluate any statistically significant differences between the material/procedure combinations. The results show that the tested materials do not affect the resulting surface quality but roughness values depend on the finishing/polishing procedure adopted. The procedures that involve: (a) the finishing with medium Sof-Lex discs and (b) the finishing with two tungsten carbide multi-blade milling cutters Q series and UF series are those that allow the lowest values of roughness to be obtained.
2015
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/todentj/index.htm
Roughness analysis on composite materials (Microfilled, nanofilled and silorane) after different finishing and polishing procedures / Pettini, Francesco; Corsalini, Massimo; Savino, Maria Grazia; Stefanachi, Gianluca; Di Venere, Daniela; Pappalettere, Carmine; Monno, Giuseppe; Boccaccio, Antonio. - In: THE OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL. - ISSN 1874-2106. - 9:(2015), pp. 357-367. [10.2174/1874210601509010357]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/61746
Citazioni
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact