Sustaible development has become a significant worldwide concern, and Building Environment Assessment (BEA) for green building play an important role to achieve sustaibility in buildings. In some countries, rating tools are been used, such as LEED in the US, BREEAM in the UK, and Green Star in Australia. However, Saudi Arabia is yet to develop these tools. A first step recently is the development of the new established council (the Saudi Green Building Council) in Saudi Arabia has the full responsibility to develop such tools. This research investigates the environmental issues that could underpin such a tool and it discusses the evolution framework for developing a tiol rating tool for green buildings. The research has investigated the Saudi opinions in developing the new framework, and clarified the most important building applications, environmental scope of studies, and the most important key performance areas (KPA's) in assessing the buildings in Saudi Arabia. This research concludes that Saudi Arabia has a different priority in considering sustaibility in buildings due to the differences in the country environment, location, economy, and community culture. Daily energy saving and water resources were equally the highest priority then any other key performance indicators (KPA's). A more interesting result was preserving the social and cultural character was far more important than carbon dioxide emission reduction. In addition the research has provided an evolution framework including, weighting system for the KPA's. Filly, this research includes recommendations for the development of a new BEA for Saudi Arabia.

The evolution of a framework for Building Environmental Assessment (BEA) for green buildings in Saudi Arabia

FIORITO, Francesco
2012-01-01

Abstract

Sustaible development has become a significant worldwide concern, and Building Environment Assessment (BEA) for green building play an important role to achieve sustaibility in buildings. In some countries, rating tools are been used, such as LEED in the US, BREEAM in the UK, and Green Star in Australia. However, Saudi Arabia is yet to develop these tools. A first step recently is the development of the new established council (the Saudi Green Building Council) in Saudi Arabia has the full responsibility to develop such tools. This research investigates the environmental issues that could underpin such a tool and it discusses the evolution framework for developing a tiol rating tool for green buildings. The research has investigated the Saudi opinions in developing the new framework, and clarified the most important building applications, environmental scope of studies, and the most important key performance areas (KPA's) in assessing the buildings in Saudi Arabia. This research concludes that Saudi Arabia has a different priority in considering sustaibility in buildings due to the differences in the country environment, location, economy, and community culture. Daily energy saving and water resources were equally the highest priority then any other key performance indicators (KPA's). A more interesting result was preserving the social and cultural character was far more important than carbon dioxide emission reduction. In addition the research has provided an evolution framework including, weighting system for the KPA's. Filly, this research includes recommendations for the development of a new BEA for Saudi Arabia.
46th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association, ANZAScA 2012
9780646591698
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/99844
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact