This paper is a contribution towards the identification of the best optimization algorithm to detect convenient disassembly sequences for end-of-life industrial products. Three methodologies are proposed for comparison: Artificial Colony Optimization, Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing. These algorithms are compared using case studies including partial and full disassembly.

A comparative experimental study of heuristics for multi objective disassembly planning / Marchionna, P.; Paradiso, S.; Percoco, Gianluca. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL & MECHANICS ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2227-2771. - 16:5(2016), pp. 54-62.

A comparative experimental study of heuristics for multi objective disassembly planning

PERCOCO, Gianluca
2016-01-01

Abstract

This paper is a contribution towards the identification of the best optimization algorithm to detect convenient disassembly sequences for end-of-life industrial products. Three methodologies are proposed for comparison: Artificial Colony Optimization, Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing. These algorithms are compared using case studies including partial and full disassembly.
2016
A comparative experimental study of heuristics for multi objective disassembly planning / Marchionna, P.; Paradiso, S.; Percoco, Gianluca. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL & MECHANICS ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2227-2771. - 16:5(2016), pp. 54-62.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/100371
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact