One of the main signatures of short duration storms is given by Depth–Duration–Frequency (DDF) curves. In order to provide reliable estimates for small river basins or urban catchments, generally characterized by short concentration times, in this study the performances of different DDF curves proposed in literature are described and compared, in order to provide insights on the selection of the best approach in design practice, with particular reference to short durations. With this aim, 28 monitoring stations with time series of annual maximum rainfall depth characterized by sample size greater than 20 were selected in the Northern part of the Puglia region (South-Eastern Italy). In order to test the effect of the investigated DDF curves in reproducing the design peak discharge corresponding to an observed expected rainfall event, the Soil Conservation (SCS) curve number (CN) approach is exploited, generating peak discharges according to different selected combinations of the main parameters that control the critical rainfall duration. Results confirm the good reliability of the DDF curves with three parameters to adapt on short events both in terms of rainfall depth and in terms of peak discharge and, in particular, for durations up to 30 min, the three-parameter DDF curves always perform better than the two-parameter DDF.

Estimation of peak discharges under different rainfall depth–duration–frequency formulations / Gioia, Andrea; Lioi, Beatrice; Totaro, Vincenzo; Molfetta, Matteo Gianluca; Apollonio, Ciro; Bisantino, Tiziana; Iacobellis, Vito. - In: HYDROLOGY. - ISSN 2306-5338. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:4(2021). [10.3390/hydrology8040150]

Estimation of peak discharges under different rainfall depth–duration–frequency formulations

Gioia, Andrea;Lioi, Beatrice;Totaro, Vincenzo;Molfetta, Matteo Gianluca;Iacobellis, Vito
2021-01-01

Abstract

One of the main signatures of short duration storms is given by Depth–Duration–Frequency (DDF) curves. In order to provide reliable estimates for small river basins or urban catchments, generally characterized by short concentration times, in this study the performances of different DDF curves proposed in literature are described and compared, in order to provide insights on the selection of the best approach in design practice, with particular reference to short durations. With this aim, 28 monitoring stations with time series of annual maximum rainfall depth characterized by sample size greater than 20 were selected in the Northern part of the Puglia region (South-Eastern Italy). In order to test the effect of the investigated DDF curves in reproducing the design peak discharge corresponding to an observed expected rainfall event, the Soil Conservation (SCS) curve number (CN) approach is exploited, generating peak discharges according to different selected combinations of the main parameters that control the critical rainfall duration. Results confirm the good reliability of the DDF curves with three parameters to adapt on short events both in terms of rainfall depth and in terms of peak discharge and, in particular, for durations up to 30 min, the three-parameter DDF curves always perform better than the two-parameter DDF.
2021
Estimation of peak discharges under different rainfall depth–duration–frequency formulations / Gioia, Andrea; Lioi, Beatrice; Totaro, Vincenzo; Molfetta, Matteo Gianluca; Apollonio, Ciro; Bisantino, Tiziana; Iacobellis, Vito. - In: HYDROLOGY. - ISSN 2306-5338. - ELETTRONICO. - 8:4(2021). [10.3390/hydrology8040150]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_Estimation_of_Peak_Discharges_under_Different_Rainfall_Depth–Duration–Frequency_Formulations_pdfeditoriale.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11589/245041
Citazioni
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact