A comparison between two theoretical methods, recently adopted for evaluating induced currents in a human body, is here presented. In both cases, a vertical ELF electric field is assumed for the coupling to a standard human subject. Specifically, the diakoptic method (DM), applied to a homogeneous multi-sphere model of man with low partitioning degree, and the Boundary Element Method (BEM), applied to a non-homogeneous model with high partitioning degree, have been selected. The analytical and numerical formulations, respectively distinctive of the above methods, are carefully described and a number of data are reported and commented upon.
A comparative study on the induced current density in humans exposed to ELF electric fields / Amoruso, V.; Calo, Giovanna; Lattarulo, F.; Poljak, D.; Peratta, A.; Gonzalez, C.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS. - ISSN 1845-6421. - 3:1(2007), pp. 17-25. [10.24138/jcomss.v3i1.265]
A comparative study on the induced current density in humans exposed to ELF electric fields
Calo Giovanna;
2007-01-01
Abstract
A comparison between two theoretical methods, recently adopted for evaluating induced currents in a human body, is here presented. In both cases, a vertical ELF electric field is assumed for the coupling to a standard human subject. Specifically, the diakoptic method (DM), applied to a homogeneous multi-sphere model of man with low partitioning degree, and the Boundary Element Method (BEM), applied to a non-homogeneous model with high partitioning degree, have been selected. The analytical and numerical formulations, respectively distinctive of the above methods, are carefully described and a number of data are reported and commented upon.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.