The study aims to analyze the constitutive/formative essence of urban systems and European tissues reviewed with a critical, dialectic vision- that tries to find the different character of the built in his being concrete testimony of a "positive eugenics" produced by different cultures. At the same time, it try to prove the relation link enclosed in the binomial urban aesthetics/architectural identity, as significant character of the individuality of urban bodies, distinguished for geographic-areal fields expressing that complex process of ethnical/cultural/linguistic/social/building osmosis, whose characters set out, in line with the expectations of the civil area, what has been cultural and identity-making brought of the culture that has generated them. Using some samples of the study identifying the variables and indicative contexts of European realities, as interpretation of linguistic forms meaning different urban aisthesis, research will focus on the contradictory outcome which appears highlighted in this first glimpse of centuries. In fact, the undoubted architectural distinctions of the pre-modern age, inherent in Mediterranean and North European realities, testifying a concrete form of cultural Objectivism, find in time, especially with modernity, a gradual homogenization which reduces the differences homologating the characters. With this showing an intentional-critical process that push to the side the collective making towards an increasing and unexpected marginality and elects the result "ego" as a paradigm of the being contemporary; tangible evidence of a systemic thinking that interprets reality not through the mediation of heideggerian being o that relates to the world, but rather as a form of individuality that makes use of dialectical mechanisms typical of so-called "age of the technique", proposing the future of reality with a more subjective vision.
The problem of subjective individualism in the future of European cities in the 21st century. Dialectic synthesis between urban aisthesis and linguistic-architectural identity / Ieva, Matteo. - ELETTRONICO. - Volume 2:(2016), pp. 1181-1190. (Intervento presentato al convegno City as organism. New visions for urban life: 22nd ISUF, International Seminar on Urban Form tenutosi a Rome - Italy nel 22-26 semptember 2015).
The problem of subjective individualism in the future of European cities in the 21st century. Dialectic synthesis between urban aisthesis and linguistic-architectural identity
IEVA, Matteo
2016-01-01
Abstract
The study aims to analyze the constitutive/formative essence of urban systems and European tissues reviewed with a critical, dialectic vision- that tries to find the different character of the built in his being concrete testimony of a "positive eugenics" produced by different cultures. At the same time, it try to prove the relation link enclosed in the binomial urban aesthetics/architectural identity, as significant character of the individuality of urban bodies, distinguished for geographic-areal fields expressing that complex process of ethnical/cultural/linguistic/social/building osmosis, whose characters set out, in line with the expectations of the civil area, what has been cultural and identity-making brought of the culture that has generated them. Using some samples of the study identifying the variables and indicative contexts of European realities, as interpretation of linguistic forms meaning different urban aisthesis, research will focus on the contradictory outcome which appears highlighted in this first glimpse of centuries. In fact, the undoubted architectural distinctions of the pre-modern age, inherent in Mediterranean and North European realities, testifying a concrete form of cultural Objectivism, find in time, especially with modernity, a gradual homogenization which reduces the differences homologating the characters. With this showing an intentional-critical process that push to the side the collective making towards an increasing and unexpected marginality and elects the result "ego" as a paradigm of the being contemporary; tangible evidence of a systemic thinking that interprets reality not through the mediation of heideggerian being o that relates to the world, but rather as a form of individuality that makes use of dialectical mechanisms typical of so-called "age of the technique", proposing the future of reality with a more subjective vision.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
